By Payusnomind · Dec 28, 2025
Free
Why it exists, what’s actually new, and why “you could already deduct expenses” misses the point
Every few years, something passes through Congress that sounds helpful to artists but gets misunderstood almost immediately.
The HITS Act is one of those things.
You’ve probably seen it framed like this:
“Artists can now deduct recording costs. Big win!”
And then the immediate pushback:
“You could already deduct business expenses. This changes nothing.”
Both statements are partially true.
But the second one misses the entire reason the HITS Act exists.
Let’s clear it up.
Yes, artists could always deduct business expenses.
That was never the issue.
The issue was timing.
Before the HITS Act, recorded music was treated as a capital asset, not a normal operating expense.
That meant:
Recording an album wasn’t deducted immediately
Costs were capitalized and amortized
Deductions were spread over years
Often long after the artist actually paid the bills
So while you might spend $20,000 recording an album this year, the IRS didn’t let you deduct that $20,000 this year.
You got a slow drip of deductions while the cash was already gone.
For independent artists, that’s brutal.
The HITS Act allows recording costs to be deducted immediately instead of amortized over time.
That includes:
Studio time
Mixing and mastering
Producer fees
Session musicians
Engineering costs
In plain English:
Money spent making music can now reduce your taxable income in the same year you spend it.
That’s the difference.
This is where people get tripped up.
Yes, expenses were deductible eventually.
But not all deductions are created equal.
Immediate deductions:
Reduce this year’s tax bill
Improve short-term cash flow
Lower estimated quarterly taxes
Reduce the risk of paying tax on money you don’t actually have
Amortized deductions:
Lag behind reality
Help later, when you may not need them
Are useless if you burn out, quit, or never recoup
For artists operating on thin margins, timing is everything.
Major labels don’t care about this nearly as much as indie artists do.
Why?
They already expense across massive portfolios
Losses are offset elsewhere
Cash flow isn’t personal survival money
Independent artists:
Pay recording costs out of pocket
Operate as sole proprietors or small LLCs
Feel tax pressure immediately
Are often paying taxes while still reinvesting everything back into music
The HITS Act is a cash-flow fix, not a generosity move.
This is where expectations get out of control.
The HITS Act does not:
Create free money
Make music profitable
Guarantee refunds
Override bad accounting
Replace proper business structure
If you didn’t track expenses before, this won’t save you.
If your music never generated income, this won’t magically change that.
It simply aligns tax reality with financial reality.
You benefit the most if you:
Actively release music
Spend real money recording
Generate at least some taxable income
Are reinvesting earnings into production
File as a business (or should be)
If you release sporadically and spend $200 every two years, this isn’t life-changing.
If you drop projects consistently and invest thousands per release, this matters.
The HITS Act is not a “music industry savior.”
It’s a quiet correction.
It acknowledges that recorded music isn’t some long-term industrial asset anymore.
It’s operating inventory for modern creators.
And for once, the tax code caught up.
This is one of those changes that:
Won’t trend on TikTok
Won’t make headlines
Won’t help people who don’t already treat music like a business
But for artists doing things right, it removes unnecessary friction.
Not flashy.
Not revolutionary.
Just practical.
And honestly, that’s exactly what artists actually need.